Pastor's Page
By Fr. George Welzbacher
November 8, 2009

Over and above the very worst features of current proposals for health care reforin-namely ambiguities in wording that could be construed to allow funding of abortion with federal dollars and to impose compulsory participation by health care personnel and health care institutions, in procedures that are fundamentally immoral-there are other troubling features that call for attention, too. Betsy McCaughey, formerly Lieutenant Governor of the State of New York and currently the national chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths, summarized in an Op-Ed essay in the Wall Street Journal for October 29th the serious concerns voiced at a recent gathering (October 19th) of some of America's most distinguished physicians and surgeons. May I share with you here Ms. McCaughey's presentation of those concerns.
*          *         *         *         *

Doctors on Health-Care Reform
   By: Betsy McCaughey
   The Wall Street Journal
   Thursday, October 29, 2009

Doctors from across the country were invited to the White House on October 5, but the president did most of the talking. Medical professionals are being ignored or vilified more often than consulted in the current health-care reform debate.  To broaden the discussion, the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths invited 16 highly regarded physicians to convene at the Grand Hyatt in New York City on October 19 to reflect on the current legislative proposals. Here's what they had to say on four key issues.

Government-Imposed Treatment Guidelines

Dr. Jeffrey Borer, cardiologist, named to Castle Connolly's "America's Top Doctors": "What's the impact of guidelines on the doctor-patient relationship? Guidelines step in between the doctor and the patient. If it's necessary to respond to guidelines rather than what you see, feel and hear when you're evaluating a person, then perhaps you're going to do something that isn't really the right thing.    There really isn't an average patient. Every person that you see with a medical problem has some unusual or unique characteristic and this often has to be considered in dealing with the problem."

Dr. David Fields, obstetrician and gynecologist, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York: "They tend to forbid better-than-average medical care; guidelines are always AVERAGE medical care ... they tend to cramp the physician who can do better than average."

Dr. Borer: "One of the more common problems that people have as they get older is a disease called aortic stenosis ... [W]e can relieve that aortic stenosis with an operation with really very acceptable safety, low mortality rates ... if that 85-year-old cannot walk down the street because he or she is too breathless to do so ... or feels light-headed or could faint and break a hip ... then there is really a very good justification for offering the therapy."

Dr. Richard Amerling, nephrologist, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York: "The example that you gave of valve surgery in an 85-year-old is just not going to happen under Ezekiel Emanuel [White House health care adviser and brother of Presidential adviser, Rahm Emanuel]. He's going to just say that that's a nonstarter. That person has outlived their useful years, no matter how long they could live beyond that."

Dr. Borer: 'What we're hearing from the president's medical advisers is that what we have is good enough and we really shouldn't be wanting or expecting any more."

Dr. Seymour Cohen, oncologist, named to named to "America's Top Doctors":  "When we went to medical school, people used to die at 66, 67 and 68. Medicare paid for two or three years. Social Security paid for two or three years. We're the bad guys. We're responsible for keeping people alive to 85. So we're now going to try to CHANGE health care because PEOPLE ARE LIVING TOO LONG. It just doesn't make very good sense to me."

Shifting Resources from Specialty to Primary Care

Dr. Cohen: "Let's talk about specialization for a moment ... We don't go to our general attorney when we have a patent problem, but they're telling us to do this now in medicine. We have different types of engineers, even journalists. There's a financial writer, there's a sportswriter .... Now in health care we're telling everybody, 'you just go to the guy who's your general doc. He's going to know everything and maybe we'll find a specialist for you if the panel decides maybe you're sick enough to need a specialist.' It really doesn't make sense at all."

Dr. Jeffrey Moses, interventional cardiologist, named to "America's Top Doctots": "If you have heart failure or a heart attack or coronaries in general in the hospital, you need to be treated by a cardiologist. Study after study shows that ... when you have an illness and you want to have an accurate diagnosis and the most up-to-date and accurate treatment, you want a specialist."

Patient Privacy

Dr. Samuel Guillory, ophthalmologist, refractive and orbital surgery, named to Castle Connolly's "New York's Top Doctors":   "We're being asked by the executive branch ... to break the code with patients and deliver all their records into electronic medical records... "

Cost-Cutting Methods

Dr. Fields: "Government is in the process of duplicating everything that managed care did for the last 15 years that was reviled by everybody and which we fought very hard to overcome. The courts finally said 'You can't have withholds, you can't pay people to DENY care. You can't have gag rules.' The government is in  the process of doing all that. Massachusetts is about to establish capitation [a fixed payment remitted at regular intervals to a medical provider] as the rule of the state. Capitation was the worst thing that ever happened to medical care."

Dr. Joel Pfeifer, plastic surgeon, president, New York Regional Society of Plastic Surgeons: "When physicians graduate from  medical school we take an oath, the Hippocratic Oath, TO DO NO HARM TO OUR PATIENTS. It's a very important philosophy to us and we uphold it and hold it very dear to our hearts.... These government programs that are being proposed I think are very scary in the sense that physicians could be induced to violate the Hippocratic Oath.

"There's a limit to how much of a financial penalty each individual practitioner is going to be able to bear ... If the patient is sitting in the examination room with us and they're wondering. 'Is the doctor not ordering a test for me because he's going to get penalized if he does it?'  This is a major, major problem for patients and physicians alike." [Emphasis added]